Optimization of Triarylpyridinone Inhibitors of the Main Protease of SARS-CoV-2 to Low-Nanomolar Antiviral Potency.

Non-covalent inhibitors of the main protease (Mpro) of SARS-CoV-2 having a pyridinone core were previously reported with IC50 values as low as 0.018 µM for inhibition of enzymatic activity and EC50 values as low as 0.8 µM for inhibition of viral replication in Vero E6 cells. The series has now been further advanced by consideration of placement of substituted five-membered-ring heterocycles in the S4 pocket of Mpro and N-methylation of a uracil ring. Free energy perturbation calculations provided guidance on the choice of the heterocycles, and protein crystallography confirmed the desired S4 placement. Here we report inhibitors with EC50 values as low as 0.080 µM, while remdesivir yields values of 0.5-2 µM in side-by-side testing with infectious SARS-CoV-2. A key factor in the improvement is enhanced cell permeability, as reflected in PAMPA measurements. Compounds 19 and 21 are particularly promising as potential therapies for COVID-19, featuring IC50 values of 0.044-0.061 µM, EC50 values of ca. 0.1 µM, good aqueous solubility, and no cytotoxicity.

Structure-guided design of a perampanel-derived pharmacophore targeting the SARS-CoV-2 main protease.

There is a clinical need for direct-acting antivirals targeting SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, to complement current therapeutic strategies. The main protease (Mpro) is an attractive target for antiviral therapy. However, the vast majority of protease inhibitors described thus far are peptidomimetic and bind to the active-site cysteine via a covalent adduct, which is generally pharmacokinetically unfavorable. We have reported the optimization of an existing FDA-approved chemical scaffold, perampanel, to bind to and inhibit Mpro noncovalently with IC50s in the low-nanomolar range and EC50s in the low-micromolar range. Here, we present nine crystal structures of Mpro bound to a series of perampanel analogs, providing detailed structural insights into their mechanism of action and structure-activity relationship. These insights further reveal strategies for pursuing rational inhibitor design efforts in the context of considerable active-site flexibility and potential resistance mechanisms.